"Israel is a fake," says Falid, the approximately
30-year old Druze in Katzrin, capital of the Golan Heights on the east side of
the Sea of Galilee, 1967 captured by Israel. Falid runs a small canteen for the
people from the surrounding industrial area and opens it for other visitors
like us, too. Falids parents became Israeli citizens, and so Falid also has an
Israeli passport yet wants to emigrate rather sooner than later. "Israel raises
its children to disintegrate," he says, the Jews are brought up in the awareness
to be something better.
"If Israel was Serbia, we'd have bombed Israel into
the stone age 30 years ago," writes Marc, the 43 year-old government
employee from Washington, in a heated Facebook discussion with Israelis and
Palestinians. He holds – together with Jewish friends in the U.S. – the opinion
that Israel is abusing its position of power and is becoming more and more of an
unjust regime.
His argument that certainly speaks to the heart of many
Palestinians: only that State has a right to exist that deserves it through
good and righteous behavior.
Why do these opinions give me a pain in my neck? As a German
who was born only a few years after World War II in a nation that has a long
and dark history with the Jews, I can probably better empathize with the
feelings of the elderly Israelis. They have, for anything in the world the one and
only wish: that the existence of their people is never bound to a condition, not
to a single one.
Marc may be right - a rogue state gambles away its right to international recognition.
But can that refer to a country that defines itself first and foremost as a community of people
whose existence has been repeatedly and brutally called into question, at
almost all times in history?
With some surprise, I have experienced the strong will of
a number of young Palestinians to one day reclaim the former Palestinian city of
Haifa from Israel. My peace-loving friend Avi from Tel Aviv has reacted appalled
at comments into that direction, made by several people on Facebook. He did not
say so, but it was for sure on his mind: if these ideas are alive in large
parts of the Palestinian people then any peace agreement is a fraud because it formally
fixes a status quo that secretly is planned to be altered in the end.
And if the will to peace does not actually exist then you
have to agree – terrible idea for the peace loving Avi – with Israeli Prime
Minister Netanyahu who, out of distrust in the Palestinians refuses to talk with
them and barely hides the pursue of an annexation of the occupied territories.
Is there a way out? With rationally thinking people a
number of strategies are conceivable. But are the parties thinking rational? My
impression is, no – so you have to go accept the emotionality of others in
order to reach a goal. I am thinking of Hamze who as a young Palestinian
student visited the Holocaust Memorial Yad Vashem and understood the deep hurt of
the Jews. This is the way of learning and understanding that many Palestinians still
have to go. And conversely, it may need Israelis to join Palestinian, a man
with no State and no rights on his humiliating way through the check points and
the cages there to look into the soul of the other.
And then people have to come from outside that draw an
unvarnished picture of the possible ways today, draw it in friendship. Maybe
the Turks can, maybe the Turks and we Germans can do it together. And to this
ways belongs, on the Palestinian side the willingness to give up positions and,
on the Israeli side a will to recognize the Palestinians as brothers, to make their
freedom and their welfare a national goal of the State of Israel.
Haifa has to belong to the Jews and the future in an own free
State to the Palestinians.
2 Kommentare:
Es gibt viele Baustellen in diesem Konflikt. Der Weg ist steinig, hart aber nicht unmöglich. Man braucht dafür viel Zeit und Geduld. Ebenfalls wird man viele Opfer leisten müssen, die vorher unmöglich schienen. Beide müssen/ werden es leisten.
Es gibt allerdings eine ganze Reihe von Schritten die zu einer Lösung als Vorbedingung geleistet werden müssen. Da ist zum Beispiel zunächst einmal nötig, dass eine Lösung nur dann akzeptabel und dauerhaft sein kann, wenn Palästinenser und Israelis als gleichberechtigte Parteien an einer gemeinsamen Lösung mitarbeiten. Unterstützt werden kann/ muss diese Bereitschaft durch Freundesstaaten wie USA, EU, Türkei.
Dafür müssen Paläsinenser untereinander erst einmal einig werden. Die Israelis müssen erkennen, dass die Zeit sich ändert und die eiserne Hand der Überlegenheit keine Vorteile mehr bringt, im Gegensatz.
Wie auch eine Konfliktlösung aussehen mag, Freizügigkeit innerhalb des Staates und gleichberechtigte Wahl des Wohnortes wird sie enthalten müssen. Aufrechnung von Unrecht und Anrechten wird eine Konfliktlösung nicht vereinfachen. Ausgangspunkt einer nachhaltigen Lösung sollte der Status-quo sein. Der Weg zur Lösung ist längs eines "Pfades der verstärkten Nachhaltigkeit" zu Gunsten der Menschen, die heute in Palestina / Israel leben; eines Pfade der Unrechtsaufrechnung und Anspruchsdeklarationen vermeidet
p.s. Das Unrecht, das mit der Art und Weise, wie der moderne Staat Israel gegründet und ausgeweitet wurde, verbunden ist, kann nicht ungeschehen gemacht werden. Es ist Teil der Geschichte und sollte nicht zur Beanspruchung eines kollektiven Rechtsanspruches verwendet werden; individuelle Wiedergutmachung ist eine andere Frage.
p.s. Die Beweggründe, die zur Errichtung und Verteidigung des modernen Staates Israel geführt haben, sind nachvollziehbar. Sie begründen jedoch so wenig einen einforderbaren Rechtsanspruch wie religiöse-historische Bezüge zu "alten Zeiten" / "identitätsstiftung".
Kommentar veröffentlichen